Book Reviews on Humanism Topics

  » Home
  » Schedule
  » FIG Leaves
  » Links
  » Membership
  » Board
  » About
  » Humanism
  - Historical Overview
  - Humanism 101
  - Types of Humanism 
  - Humanist Poetry 
  - Humanist Book Reviews 
    »  Case for Humanism
    »  Road to Reason
    »  Living Without Religion
    »  Hypatia of Alexandria
    »  Women Without Superstition
    »  2000 Years of Disbelief  
    »  The Godless Constitution
    »  God's Funeral
    »  Who's Who in Hell
    »  The Ghost in the Universe
    »  Science and Religion
  » Search
  » News
  » FIG Forum
 
  Humanists.net
 

 

The Ghost in the Universe: God in the Light of Modern Science

by Taner Edis
(Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2002)

     Anyone who would like to know why he can not believe in god or is an agnostic ought to read this book. The author examines the "god exists" question from all sides. Science in this context means not only physics and biology, but includes the social sciences, historical scholarship, and any other modality by which humans have examined the god question. Edis is a professor of physics at a mid-western University, an unbeliever and skeptic. He grew up in Turkey, so that he shares an intimate knowledge of Islam.
     Edis quickly reviews the philosophical proofs of god. These have been demolished since classical antiquity, so he can make short shrift. There is no necessity for god, neither in reason, nor in experience, nor in logic, but neither can philosophy show us the absence of god, only the absence of overambitious divinities who are all powerful, all good, and all knowing. Lesser gods, as Epicurus allowed, may rule in the interstices between good and evil.
     Physics has shown us that no gods are needed to crank the axle of the universe. Isaac Newton’s theory of gravity found a cosmos in which mechanical laws alone moved the stars and planets. Modern physics profoundly forged our view of the cosmos, and at the same time shrank the places where god could actively intervene. Eventually, in the words of the mathematician Pierre-Simon Laplace the god hypothesis was no longer needed. Modern physics has moved beyond rigid physical law to see an underlying microscopic substratum where random events are dominant. The basic randomness of quantum mechanics appears necessary to allow unpredictable action, including the freedom of human choices.
     Next Edis looks at related random acts of trial and error which make biological evolution possible. The evolutionary explanation of life makes rejection of the argument for design possible. Edis explanations are simple and clear. "But when God vanishes from physics, indeed, from all natural science, it begins to look like there is no God after all." (p. 107)
     What about history then, which plays such a major role in the monotheistic religions? The holy books describe a divine drama with a beginning, meaningful progress, and an end when judgement will be passed on the good and the evil. Rational history has found no place for god, his actions or his intervention. Like biological evolution and atomic physics, human history appears driven by random accidents. Neither religious transcendence nor divine guidance seem built into the fabric of history. Critical assessment in the writing of history is continuous with science in that similar logic and reason are required. No Biblical pattern of tribal loyalty and divine retribution has been discovered.
     The historical events in first century Palestine, which are of such immense importance to the Christian religions, fell apart on first rational examination three centuries ago. It is plausible that some events of execution and resurrection underlie the fable of the risen Jesus. But if so, whatever happened is lost to us. Modern Christians today no longer appear to believe in the Bible, nor do they act eager to find their way into another world or to god. If knowledge no longer comes from the Bible, where do liberal Christians obtain their god information?
     Edis looks into the question of miracles of the soul. Is there a spiritual science, does parapsychology point to the supernatural? Can statistical tests at least tease out a reality of extra-sensory knowledge? Do near-death-experiences point a way? Can we rely on the words of the great mystics or miracle workers? The evidence is negative or absent all around. What then, and finally, about ethics and action? Is there, or can there even be, a morality beyond pragmatism and the needs a social animal? Is there nothing but this accidental world, no justification beyond what works in the market. In his conclusion Edis asks why we insist on faith. He examines the god of song and story, the mythology of divine falsehoods. Ultimately we like the consolation of a good story, in which the just Hobbit wins out over the powers of darkness and the good manage to banish evil at least for a short while. Religion seems a necessary myth because it works for human society.

— Wolf Roder


For Questions or Concerns about the Free Inquiry Group Website
please contact or the

 

Copyright© 2007 Free Inquiry Group, Inc.